Akasha in consciousness-as-dimension doesn’t have to disagree with string theory’s model of ten dimensions. The fractalized universe shows the ways small and large things are similarly ordered. If we guessed that an atom is vaguely akin to a solar system, or an animal cell akin to a human country, could we extrapolate out that Akasha is the “larger” Correlate of an organism? In string theory, dimension five is considered an alternate universe–and I could compare that slightly different universe to the “movement” of Akashic intersection that is an individual’s lifetime. It would be like the lifetime of a sole universe changing from one position to another. Climbing to the theorized tenth dimension, we encompass all potential universes and timelines, which can be visualized as a Community. Akasha contains all possible lives in a single universe–plant, animal, fungi, anything conscious–like a smaller (but still absurdly complex) version of this tenth dimensional Community.

Lower lifeforms like humans are then akin to dots trying to visualize time (dimension 1 to dimension 4) when we theorize such ideas. We are genuinely the universe (multiverse Community?) trying to understand itself. In our current bodies, we can’t grasp this any better than a protein in a cell can grasp its host organism’s attempt to buy a bagel at a food cart. It’s very sweet that we try.

• Individual can’t grasp these huge concepts–but could a more complex Community of humans manage it?
• Science is one way broader human Communities create more enduring information storage and recall.